Players
Political leaders, tech CEOs, and financiers in their own words on the future of AI, public AI, and AI sovereignty. Ranked, within each group, by how likely they are to commit to a Large Model Training Consortium: a shared, multi-party effort to build frontier AI together rather than depend on a single superpower.
Ranked by readiness to join a Large Model Training Consortium
A Large Model Training Consortium means many states or firms pooling compute, data, and money to build frontier AI together, instead of depending on the US or China. Each group is ranked on its own scale: left to right runs blue to red, from the most likely to commit to such a consortium to the least, as the end labels describe. Tap any name to open its card.
Personas
The full roster as trading cards. Click any card to open its dossier: stance, AI-sovereignty position, sources, and clips. The colour strip echoes the spectrum above.
Transcripts, clustered by AI sovereignty stance
The same voices, grouped by where they locate AI sovereignty rather than who they are. Each card carries a representative line, then a connector down to the person who said it. Tap the name to watch the clip it came from. Lines in italics are paraphrased positions; lines in quotation marks are close to verbatim.